We all love hearing the Champions League anthem blaring at
Celtic Park. There’s nothing quite like it. It’s a musical signal that this is
the big time; that sets your heart racing. This is what it’s all about. The pinnacle
of club football and Celtic are in it. Every Celtic manager this century has
been judged in Europe and the Champions League is where we have to be to
consider ourselves, “successful.”
Ronny Deila is the only Celtic manager (Brendan hasn’t
finished yet) to have a 100% league win rate. He also won the League Cup and
was cheated out of a Scottish Cup Final place in his first season. Yet he was
replaced because he couldn’t get us to the Champions League and his European
record wasn’t good enough. In the 90’s, winning the league would have assured
him of a place in Celtic folklore, but now winning it twice in a row means
nothing. All that matters, apart from ten in a row (such arrogance!) is getting
to the Champions League.
But getting to the Champions League isn’t really good enough
either. We have to be “competitive” once we get there. We are chasing rainbows.
When Celtic won the European Cup in 1967, one Inter player,
Sandro Mazzola, cost more than the entire Celtic team. Fast forward to 2017,
and we’re playing teams whose most expensive players (eg Neymar), cost maybe 10
times the entire Celtic team. Even Jock Stein couldn’t have overcome those odds
and we’d be wasting money if we started buying even £10m players for the Champions
League.
I’ve fallen out of love with the Champions League over the
past few years. I watched the first ten minutes of our matches v PSG and Bayern
before switching it off. Watching Celtic get hammered is not my idea of a good
night’s entertainment. I’ve sat through countless defeats, but those matches
were not simple defeats. It was like watching Floyd Mayweather get pounded by
Anthony Joshua. There’s no point to it.
I did though thoroughly enjoy the 3-0 win over Anderlecht
and I look forward to playing them at Celtic Park in a few weeks. That’s a
proper European game to me – two national champions, evenly matched and a game
that could go either way.
But apart from that Pot4 v Pot3 match, I’ve little interest
in our section, let alone the competition. The Champions League is rigged and
it has been for years.
It’s been rigged quite deliberately and openly, and we’ve
all gone along with it in the chase for the filthy lucre that goes along with
qualification. No one kept it a secret that it’s been rigged. It’s been rigged
to ensure that the business end will always be dominated by the same select
group of teams from the same select group of countries to ensure their TV
companies get to show exactly the games the viewing public of those countries
want.
We all know who those teams and countries are. England,
Spain, Germany and Italy are the biggest TV markets for European football.
Their teams generate the biggest TV audiences and attract the most sponsorship.
The Champions League is designed so that every year teams from those countries
will dominate the latter stages of the competition.
This is achieved partly by having a group stage. This
ensures that even if one of those teams from the Big 4 countries has an
off-night, they’ll still have another couple of chances to put things right
again.
Let’s take a look at the semi-finalists in the ten years before
a group stage format was adopted in 1991-92.
Year
|
Semi-finalists *eventual winners
|
No of semi-finalists from outside Big 4
|
Big 4 Final
|
1982
|
Aston Villa* v Anderlecht
|
2
|
yes
|
CSKA Sofia v Bayern Munich
|
|||
1983
|
Real Sociedad v Hamburg*
|
1
|
yes
|
Juventus v Widzew Lodz
|
|||
1984
|
Liverpool* v Dinamo Bucharest
|
2
|
yes
|
Dundee Utd v Roma
|
|||
1985
|
Juventus* v Bordeaux
|
2
|
yes
|
Liverpool v Panathanaikos
|
|||
1986
|
Anderlecht v Steaua Bucharest*
|
3
|
no
|
Gothenburg v Barcelona
|
|||
1987
|
Porto* v Dynamo Kiev
|
2
|
no
|
Bayern Munich v Real Madrid
|
|||
1988
|
Real Madrid v PSV Eindhoven*
|
3
|
no
|
Steaua Bucharest v Benfica
|
|||
1989
|
Real Madrid v AC Milan*
|
2
|
no
|
Steaua Bucharest v Galatasary
|
|||
1990
|
AC Milan* v Bayern Munich
|
2
|
no
|
Marseilles v Benfica
|
|||
1991
|
Bayern Munich v Red Star Belgrade*
|
3
|
no
|
Spartak Moscow v Marseilles
|
Not once in that ten year period were all four
semi-finalists from the Big 4 countries. On three occasions, only ONE of the
semi-finalists came from one of the Big 4 countries. In the first four years,
both finalists were Big 4 clubs, but in the next six years, at least one
finalist came from countries outwith the Big 4. Winners in this period came
from Italy (3), England (2), Germany Romania, Portugal, Netherlands, Yugoslavia
Things began to change with the introduction of the group
stages in season 1991-92. The process began gradually, but has accelerated over
the last 25 years. At first, the group stages replaced the quarter-final and
semi-final stages. Clubs had to get past the knock-out rounds in order to reach
the group stages and qualify for the finals. This was the case for three
seasons and below are the group stages in each of those seasons
Year
|
Group A
|
Group B
|
No of Big 4 clubs
|
Finalists *winner
|
1992
|
Sampdoria
Red Star Belgrade
Anderlecht
Panathanaikos
|
Barcelona
Sparta Prague
Benfica
Dynamo Kiev
|
2
|
Sampdoria v Barcelona*
|
1993
|
Marseilles
Rangers
Brugge
CSKA Moscow
|
AC Milan
Porto
Gothenburg
PSV Eindhoven
|
1
|
Marseilles* v AC Milan
|
1994
|
Barcelona
Monaco
Spartak Moscow
Galatasary
|
Milan
Porto
Werder Bremen
Anderlecht
|
3
|
Milan* v Barcelona
|
The format was tweaked in 1994 so that there was a
one-legged semi-final, with the winners of each group getting to play at home.
In this three year period after the introduction of a group stage, there was a
maximum of three Big 4 clubs in the last eight of the competition. Two of the
three finals were contested by two Big 4 clubs, but one competition was won by
a non-Big 4 club, albeit a heavily bankrolled one.
In season 1994-95, the Champions League format was moved to
the first round of the tournament, with the top two from each group contesting
the quarter-finals. This format was in place for three seasons and the semi-finalists
in each year were as follows:
Year
|
Semi-finalists *eventual winners
|
No of semi-finalists from outside Big 4
|
Big 4 final
|
1995
|
Bayern Munich v Ajax*
|
2
|
No
|
Paris St Germain v Milan
|
|||
1996
|
Ajax v Panathanaikos
|
3
|
No
|
Juventus* v Nantes
|
|||
1997
|
Borussia Dortmund* v Man Utd
|
1
|
Yes
|
Ajax v Juventus
|
This new format still did not guarantee Big 4 dominance, and
indeed 3 of the semi-finalists were non-Big 4 in 1996. Altogether, half of the
semi-finalists were non-Big 4 in these three seasons, as they had been in three
seasons previously.
The format was changed again for season 1997-98, and this
was the first season that teams other than national champions could qualify for
the tournament. This is the second method by which the tournament is rigged in
favour of the Big 4. You beat Real Madrid? Let’s see if you can beat Barcelona
too. The semi-finalists from that point on are as follows:
Year
|
Semi-finalists *eventual winners
|
No of semi-finalists from outside Big 4
|
Big 4 final
|
1998
|
Real Madrid* v Borussia Dortmund
|
1
|
Yes
|
Juventus v Monaco
|
|||
1999
|
Man Utd* v Juventus
|
1
|
Yes
|
Dynamo Kiev v Bayern Munich
|
|||
2000
|
Valencia v Barcelona
|
0
|
Yes
|
Real Madrid* v Bayern Munich
|
|||
2001
|
Leeds Utd v Valencia
|
0
|
Yes
|
Real Madrid v Bayern Munich*
|
|||
2002
|
Barcelona v Real Madrid*
|
0
|
Yes
|
Man Utd v Bayer Leverkusen
|
|||
2003
|
Real Madrid v Juventus*
|
0
|
Yes
|
AC Milan v Inter Milan
|
|||
2004
|
Monaco v Chelsea
|
2
|
No
|
Porto v Deportivo La Coruna
|
|||
2005
|
Chelsea v Liverpool*
|
1
|
Yes
|
Milan v PSV Eindhoven
|
|||
2006
|
Arsenal v Villareal
|
0
|
Yes
|
Milan v Barcelona*
|
|||
2007
|
Chelsea v Liverpool
|
0
|
Yes
|
Man Utd v AC Milan*
|
|||
2008
|
Liverpool v Chelsea
|
0
|
Yes
|
Barcelona v Man Utd*
|
|||
2009
|
Man Utd v Arsenal
|
0
|
Yes
|
Barcelona* v Chelsea
|
|||
2010
|
Bayern Munich v Lyon
|
1
|
Yes
|
Inter Milan* v Barcelona
|
|||
2011
|
Schalke 04 v Man Utd
|
0
|
Yes
|
Real Madrid v Barcelona*
|
|||
2012
|
Bayern Munich v Real Madrid
|
0
|
Yes
|
Chelsea* v Barcelona
|
|||
2013
|
Bayern Munich* v Barcelona
|
0
|
Yes
|
Borussia Dortmund v Real Madrid
|
|||
2014
|
Real Madrid* v Bayern Munich
|
0
|
Yes
|
Atletico Madrid v Chelsea
|
|||
2015
|
Barcelona* v Bayern Munich
|
0
|
Yes
|
Juventus v Real Madrid
|
|||
2016
|
Man City v Real Madrid*
|
0
|
Yes
|
Atletico Madrid v Bayern Munich
|
|||
2017
|
Real Madrid* v Atletico Madrid
|
1
|
Yes
|
Monaco v Juventus
|
It is now 13 years since a team from outwith the Big 4 has
reached the final of the Champions League. On just seven occasions since
non-Champions were allowed into the tournament have teams from outwith the Big
4 gotten so far as the semi-final stage. Since 1992, a non-Big 4 club has won
the Champions League on only three occasions.
This season may see Paris St Germain win the Champions League,
but it won’t be a victory for meritocracy. It won’t blaze a trail for other
non-Big 4 clubs. It won’t point to the possibility that teams from outwith the
Big 4 can build a team to win the Champions League. All it would prove is that
throwing obscene amounts of money at a club can win you the Champions League
regardless of what league you play in. It’s still a rich man’s playground.
Three things ensure that TV audiences in the Big 4 countries
will get what they want from the Champions League every season – non-Champion
participation for select leagues, seeding, and the group stages.
Once upon a time, if you beat the Champions of Spain, you
still might have the Champions of Italy, England or Germany to contend with,
but with no seeding, there was a strong possibility they’d eliminate each other
at some stage. This opened up the way for clubs from smaller nations. It’s not
out of the question even now that they could beat Big 4 clubs in a knock-out
tie. In 2006, Celtic beat Man Utd 1-0 at Celtic Park and lost 2-3 at Old
Trafford. Had that been a two-legged tie, Celtic would have gone through on
away goals. But because it was the group stages, Man Utd qualified along with
us for the knock-out stages, and in first place, meaning they got a more
favourable draw in the Last 16. We got to play Milan.
Let’s say we had knocked out Milan (and we only lost after
extra-time), who would we have got in the next round? Well Milan got Bayern
Munich. Others in that quarter-final draw were Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea,
Valencia, Roma and PSV Eindhoven. Three English clubs, two Italians, one Spanish,
one German and one Dutch club. So that year, just one non-Big 4 club reached even
the quarter-finals. Also that year, Bayern Munich were paired with Real Madrid
in the Last 16 draw, an anomaly as they were both expected to win their groups
so shouldn’t have had to play each other at that stage.
So to sum up the three ways it is ensured Big 4 countries
dominate the business end of the Champions League:
1)
Beat a team from one of the Big 4 countries and
there are still plenty more of them in your way due to there being 3 to 4 clubs
from each of them in the tournament
2)
Due to seeding, these clubs don’t often meet
each other in the earlier rounds, so don’t knock each other out before the
knock-out stages
3)
If one of these clubs loses matches in the group
stages, they’ll still have plenty of chances to turn the situation round again.
In the last TEN Champions League competitions, only 15 clubs
from across Europe have reached the semi-finals. Real Madrid and Barcelona lead
the way with seven appearances each, while Bayern Munich have six appearances.
It is now eleven years since there was a semi-final round that did not contain
either Barcelona or Real Madrid.
The Champions League is rigged to ensure Big 4 clubs
dominate and clubs with great historical traditions such as Celtic, Ajax, Feyenoord,
Benfica, Porto, etc get nowhere near the
business end.
That’s why I have fallen out of love with the Champions League
but what can we do about it?
It’s not going to happen sadly, but for me, the associations
outwith the Big 4 need to stand up for themselves. They need to demand change
so that their own clubs have a least a fighting chance of getting somewhere in
the competition.
The first thing that needs to happen is the competition be
open to Champions only. How can you call a competition, “The Champions League,”
when half the teams in it are not even champions?
With only national champions involved, clubs from smaller
nations will have a greater chance of reaching the latter stages. They’ll still
have to beat a big gun at some point, but having done so, they won’t inevitably
find themselves with another impossible task in the next round.
As the semi-final tables above show, the Big 4 countries
will still win a fair proportion of titles, but the same handful of clubs won’t
be able to dominate the whole competition season after season.
The next question is can
we do anything about it? The answer, I think, is “yes.”
By acting collectively, the smaller associations can force
change. The Big 4 want to carve the competition up between themselves, but it
only has any prestige because it is a Europe wide competition.
They don’t want the tiresome task of playing the champions
of Croatia in the quarter-finals, but they do need these smaller teams to be in
it. They won’t be Champions of Europe if the competition only consists of clubs
from four countries.
They don’t want us getting above ourselves. They don’t want
to see their viewing figures drop because smaller teams are reaching the latter
stages, but they do need us.
Not only would a Champions League of teams from only
England, Italy, Germany and Spain not be a truly European competition and
therefore far less prestigious, they’d soon get bored of playing each other all
the time as well. Real Madrid v Bayern Munich is only an exciting event when
they don’t play each other every season.
How much bigger a deal would a Barcelona-Chelsea Champions League
Final be, if they hadn’t played each other half a dozen times in the past ten
years already?
The smaller associations have more collective bargaining
power than they seem to realise. If they set up a competition minus the Big 4
it would be a whole lot more interesting than a Big 4 only competition. There’d
be a whole lot of huge clubs with proud histories and massive followings
suddenly finding themselves with a chance of winning big deal international
club competitions again. And it would be a whole lot bigger than a four nation
competition.
We should demand changes be made to the Champions League to
stop the Big 4 rigging the competition and not be afraid to walk away and leave
them to it if they refuse.
Great analysis - thanks.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree that little will change. Big money talks.
Thanks Donny.
ReplyDeleteThe smaller associations should try regardless. Nothing at all to lose.
Hopefully some mega rich Arab decides Celtic are such an Iconic Club that it's time the lions were joined in folklore 2nd Time a Tiny Nation won the prize again and he joined Sir Robert
ReplyDeleteBrilliant piece of work. If only our clubs and associations would get off their butts and grow a set of balls instead being greatfull for every scrap that falls from the rich clubs table. It is not a Champions League as it is
ReplyDeleteGreat article and analysis. As you say, the footballing world has stood by and let it happen.
ReplyDeleteCan I share this with a credit?
Hi Murph,
DeleteThat's fine.
An excellent piece. Used to love this tournament, but it is now just a bore. For one of the big four to have 5 teams in the 'competition' this year proves your point. UEFA may force the smaller associations hands if their rumoured plans to grant some of the bigger clubs automatic entry come to pass.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting only to see just what high levels of football can be achieved but it is no longer a sporting game. As you say, Daniel, it's a rigged money factory for the rich clubs, very much like society in general. Smaller clubs will never again be able to challenge at the death.
ReplyDeleteI Think American football also went through a stsge where tge mega rich clubs bought all the best players, thus screwing up the whole balance. Dont quote me but i think each team now has a buget ftor players.
ReplyDeleteExcellent read,I knew someone would see that this is no longer about football,as it is it is solely about revenue,nothing more.
ReplyDeleteAnd Daniel you are 100% correct in your summation,We smaller clubs NEED to stick together and stop this charade of Fantasy Football,although I doubt very much that the big 4 will easily relinquish their grip on their money-making-machine.
I sincerely hope I’m wrong on that one.It would be nice if we CFC🍀 fans were bought over by a truly rich conglomerate,but for me that isn’t working our way,that’s just buying your way,PSG like,to success.And We are forever hearing the rotten mob bleating on about that very same thing,WE ARE BETTER than that.Working slowly to reach the latter stages must be the way,we cannot stoop to their level.
Nothing worthwhile ever comes easy.HH🍀